Analysis Report for AUST54 ($14OCT18XA) (Analyzed by David Gordon, Goddard Space Flight Center. Spoolfile source: interactive solve/nuSolve analysis.) Problems: None. Parameterization comments: Clock breaks set at Yarragadee at 21:40:39 (-0.6 nsec) and 23:06:19 (+0.6 nsec). Other comments: None. ----------------------------------------- Session Statistics Observations: 3031 scheduled 2962 correlated (in database) 2904 recoverable (usable) 2851 used Session fit: 51.737 ps ----------------------------------------- Station Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled obs used HOBART12 1949 1837 1810 92.9% KATH12M 1950 1905 1871 95.9% WARK12M 215 188 188 87.4% YARRA12M 1948 1878 1833 94.1% --------------- --------- ----------- --------- ------ Station Total** 3031 2904 2851 94.1% * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. ** Total includes distinct observations only. MISSED: Station was scheduled, but it did not observe. NOT CORR: Station was scheduled but not correlated. NOT USED: Usable data was generated for this station, but the analyst rejected it all. ----------------------------------------- Source Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Correlated* Used % of scheduled obs used 0537-441 84 79 78 92.9% 0727-115 102 96 90 88.2% 1424-418 126 121 113 89.7% 1144-379 72 70 70 97.2% 1128+385 18 18 16 88.9% 1057-797 21 21 20 95.2% 1510-089 57 57 57 100.0% 1038+064 18 18 17 94.4% 0230-790 6 6 4 66.7% OJ287 39 35 35 89.7% 1308+326 27 27 26 96.3% 1610-771 48 46 41 85.4% 0637-752 96 94 88 91.7% 0454-463 66 64 63 95.5% 0521-365 63 61 60 95.2% 1519-273 57 57 57 100.0% 0607-157 57 55 51 89.5% 0648-165 57 53 50 87.7% 0454-810 90 90 89 98.9% 1104-445 63 61 61 96.8% 0723-008 42 38 37 88.1% 0748+126 30 26 24 80.0% 1144+402 9 9 9 100.0% 0834-201 24 24 24 100.0% 0826-373 27 27 27 100.0% 0516-621 15 15 15 100.0% 1451-375 24 24 24 100.0% 1548+056 12 12 11 91.7% 3C274 18 18 15 83.3% 1657-261 6 6 6 100.0% 1255-316 9 9 8 88.9% 1034-293 18 18 17 94.4% NRAO530 45 45 40 88.9% 0919-260 6 6 6 100.0% 1656+053 6 6 6 100.0% 1124-186 6 6 6 100.0% 1741-038 96 96 89 92.7% 2142-758 12 12 12 100.0% 1611+343 27 27 27 100.0% 1749+096 45 45 43 95.6% 1921-293 108 108 103 95.4% 1954-388 27 27 27 100.0% 1633+38 21 21 21 100.0% 1908-201 21 21 20 95.2% NRAO512 15 15 14 93.3% 2052-474 72 72 72 100.0% 1751+288 21 21 21 100.0% 1958-179 57 57 52 91.2% 1920-211 10 10 9 90.0% 2232-488 39 39 39 100.0% 2149-306 42 42 42 100.0% 2029+121 12 12 10 83.3% 2128-123 12 12 11 91.7% 2255-282 51 51 51 100.0% 2145+067 48 48 45 93.8% 2355-534 30 30 30 100.0% 3C446 48 48 48 100.0% 2136+141 36 36 35 97.2% 2243-123 15 15 14 93.3% 2131-021 12 12 12 100.0% 2121+053 18 18 18 100.0% CTA102 15 15 14 93.3% 2201+315 21 21 20 95.2% 2355-106 9 9 9 100.0% 0003-066 9 9 9 100.0% 0308-611 24 24 24 100.0% 0208-512 12 10 9 75.0% 0106+013 45 45 42 93.3% 0202-172 9 9 9 100.0% 0332-403 60 58 56 93.3% 0119+115 30 30 30 100.0% 0426-380 54 52 51 94.4% 0229+131 21 21 20 95.2% 0202+319 27 27 26 96.3% CTA26 48 46 46 95.8% 0234+285 27 27 26 96.3% 0454-234 60 58 57 95.0% 0420-014 51 49 49 96.1% NRAO190 30 28 27 90.0% NRAO140 9 9 8 88.9% 0528+134 36 34 33 91.7% 0657+172 21 19 17 81.0% 0552+398 18 18 14 77.8% 4C39.25 30 25 24 80.0% 0738+313 6 6 5 83.3% ------------ --------- ---------- ------ ------ Source Total 3031 2962 2851 94.1% * Correlated: included in database ----------------------------------------- Baseline Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled obs used HOBART12-KATH12M 939 901 893 95.1% HOBART12-WARK12M 72 58 58 80.6% HOBART12-YARRA12M 938 878 859 91.6% KATH12M-WARK12M 72 67 67 93.1% KATH12M-YARRA12M 939 937 911 97.0% WARK12M-YARRA12M 71 63 63 88.7% ----------------- --------- ----------- ---------- ------ Baseline Total 3031 2904 2851 94.1% * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. MISSED: Baseline was scheduled, but at least one of the sites did not observe. NOT CORR: Baseline was scheduled but not correlated. NO DATA: The baseline's stations were both correlated, but they did not observe together. DESELECTED: Usable data was generated for the baseline, but the analyst rejected it.